It looks for usage that have particular verbs or even in an effective particular sense of the latest verb

20 Sep It looks for usage that have particular verbs or even in an effective particular sense of the latest verb

/bi-/ might have been advertised having locative-terminative force in lieu of strictly locative push having /ba-/, however, Thomsen states toward p. 184, this “is most probably maybe not immediately useful why out of concord having an effective loc.-name. or loc. noun, however it rather suits the fresh new semantic differentiation of your verb. “

>ba(I): have good separative means. Inside OBGT it directly correlates with >Akkadian t-stems. (Thomsen, following the Jacobsen, confuses t-stems >to your Akkadian primary.) Their updates is actually immediately following the fresh ventive >marker meters and then the b is actually assimilated: m-ba- > m-ma, of course, if it is >accompanied by a 2nd individual pronoun, it will become meters-ma > m-mu (therefore ba >is not always easy to identify). About absence of the new >ventive marker they takes up the initial reputation regarding the strings, right after which it >dont continually be celebrated regarding ba(II). A clear instance is >ba-ne-su8-be2-en-de3-dentro de = ni-it-tal2-lak cu-nu-ci = we go away >on it (OBGT VII, 305). > >ba(II): have good stative/couch potato function. Inside the OBGT VI, it is rendered by the >a c-base stative/couch potato, or a keen Nt-base passive. Apparently, ba(II) >uses up the first condition about chain. ba-ab-gar, ba-ab-gar-re-dentro de >= cuckun, cuckunaku = he has got come put / I was set >(by anyone unnamed). The new variations ba-gar, ba-gar-re-en, . ba-na-gar, >ba-na-gar-re-dentro de for the OBGT VI, traces 160-165, was not clear; they can >alternatively getting interpreted given that ba(I), particularly the next collection, >which is one or two-new member, additionally the OB grammarian, just who rendered him or her >from the Nt-stem passives, aswell preserved the ambiguity. > >Your own statement clearly pertains to ba(II), but Really don’t found it merely a beneficial >case of preference, immediately after you’ve got put ba(I) aside. Naturally, it is >method outside of my personal resources and you will my proficiency to check my personal above >syntactical/lexical claims from the unilingual messages. > >Using my sincerely, >Peter J. Huber

I imagined of all the intransitive phrases that stop that have ba-Options, eg ba-gul, “it absolutely was missing”. As you say, those fall-in the course out of ba(II).

I would has envision it was a beneficial >Hebrew keyword, then again once more, I am not sure the relationship of one’s Sumerian >words and the Hebrew words

Thanks for taking the time to try and describe so it material. I’m able to try to outline exactly what Hayes has on profiles 162 and you will 256: He agrees you to students features speculated that there are a couple of ba- conjugation prefixes which might be homonyms. “One is seen mainly when you look at the couch potato sentences, another from inside the less definable contexts.” As well as, the conjugation prefix bi2- either happens that have affordable sentences regarding the locative-terminative case and conjugation prefix ba- possibly happen that have affordable phrases regarding locative situation. “It is primarily the pattern of co-occurrence that has led numerous scholars to conclude that bi2- and you can ba- aren’t of the identical score given that other conjugation prefixes, as they are probably consisting of several ability.” Thus one to sort of ba- start around a feature you to definitely means the brand new locative case. To own good separative meaning, you expect to locate Sumerian affordable sentences end with the ablative postposition -ta.

Notice the brand new refined change >built in OBGT VI, lines 79-84, between the typical Grams-stalk stative >while the C-stalk stative/passive: an-gar, an-gar-re-dentro de = cakin, >caknaku = he or she is set, I am placed, versus

>I was curious for many who you will respond to a concern for my situation. I have comprehend somewhere >your name “Eden” is a good Sumerian term. > >Anyway, when the Heaven, Adam, and/otherwise Eve are Sumerian terminology, would you how to delete ifnotyounobody account >excite tell me if they have an interpretation/definition?

EDIN are a beneficial Sumerian keyword, but it refers to the steppe house between the two rivers, where the herd pets grazed.